The Anti-Defamation League Must Go

ADL 2020

The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) was founded in 1913 by B’nai B’rith to address the rise in institutionalized anti-Semitism in the US in 1900s. In this regard it shared many traits with other early twenty century American Irish and Italian civic fraternities. The ADL’s original mission statement was:

“To stop the defamation of the Jewish people, and to secure justice and fair treatment to all.”  This mission was extended to the ultimate goal of: “a world in which no group or individual suffers from bias, discrimination or hate.”

The ADL used to be apolitical and did a decent job in upholding their mission statement but eventually, it got entangled in progressive politics and has been gradually losing its relevance. In 2015, shortly after it recruited Jonathan Greenblatt, the current CEO, the ADL shed its political nonpartisanship affiliation and morphed into a full blown, far left auxiliary tool of the progressive elements of the Democrat party. The Irony of this move seems to have been lost on Mr. Greenblatt, as this is the same Jew hating element of the democratic party that was behind the lynching of Leo Frank—the event that triggered the formation of the ADL in the first place.

The Lynching of Leo Frank
Image 1: The 1915 lynching of Leo Frank. Seen in the middle is judge Newton Morris, a local Democratic party leader and the Grand Giant of the KKK at the Marietta, Georgia Province and three of his four Goblins 

The leaders of the lynching party were all members of the KKK and senior Democratic party officials in Marietta, Georgia. The act was cheered by local newspapers and publishers like Tom Watson—a supporter of the Socialist Party of America, who also openly identified as a white supremacist. Frank’s kidnaping and murder was overseen by judge Newton Morris (who In 1891, at the age of 22, was charged with attempted murder and cattle rustling in California) and was carried out by over 40 KKK notables such as: Joseph Mackey Brown, former governor of Georgia; Eugene Herbert Clay, former mayor of Marietta and later president of the Georgia Senate; E. P. Dobbs, mayor of Marietta; Moultrie McKinney Sessions; lawyer and banker, a clergyman, two former Superior Court justices, several Cobb County sheriffs, and various ‘professionals’.

Living on Credit
The ADL still promotes itself as a social moral compass but it has become quite the opposite. These days, it resembles a massive money laundering and an organized crime extortion machine. In 2016, it fundraised over $67 million. During the 2016 Charlottesville marches alone, it raised $11 million. Between its unlimited cash and its now undeserved reputation of civil rights organization, the ADL has turned into one of the leading political king makers and serves as an advisor to elected officials and an arbitrator in all matters related to what should or shouldn’t be considered anti-Semitism.

Despite paying lip service and shading many crocodile tears, since 2015, the ADL has done virtually nothing to fight the flood of anti-Semitism which comes almost entirely from the ranks of the progressive left, MSM outlets like the NYTimes, and Muslim Brotherhood affiliated organizations and politicians. Instead, under Greenblatt’s leadership, the ADL has been targeting imaginary white supremacists, conservatives, and the state of Israel. Yup, you read that correctly: the ADL—which started its life as a defensive Jewish league—has actually turned into one of the leading enablers/apologists of anti-Semitism and is now playing footsie with classic anti-Semitic groups like the BDS movement.

Bring in the Trojan
Appointing Jonathan Greenblatt as ADL’s CEO wasn’t coincidental. Rather, it was part of a wave of red green alliance takeovers of US civic organizations. Greenblatt is a hardcore democrat loyalist and shares the same DNA/scruples with the likes of Debbie Wasserman Schultz. Before he was parachuted behind enemy lines into the ADL, Greeblatt established his reputation as a battle hardened veteran of the Clinton and Obama administrations. He was a Special Assistant to president Obama and the Director of the Office of Social Innovation and Civic Participation (SICP) in the United States Domestic Policy Council. As director, he led the office’s efforts to utilize human capital and financial capital (concept Obama copied from the soviet People’s Commissariat).

Shared Funding and Progressive Information Warfare Platforms
A part of Greenblatt’s new political realignment for the ADL included getting funding from progressive big-tech sources like Pier Omidyar (founder of eBay), who also funds the internet censorships industry and many of the leading anti-Trump initiatives including Defeat Disinfo. As can be seen from the linkages below, Defeat Disinfo is a member of a large network of political information warfare platforms focused entirely on attacking the Trump/his administration and defeating him in the 2020 elections.

Omidyar Network
Image 2
: A sampling of one of Omidyar’s progressive information warfare network and one linkage to Curtis Hougland

Defeat Disinfo Linkage
Image 3
: Curtis Hougland, Gen. Stanley McChrystal, David Eichenbaum, the leadership of Defeat Disinfo. Hougland, currently works on multiple large scale initiatives to censor and block conservative content and users on social media. One of Hougland’s companies, Graphika, is also used by social media platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and Google to detect and mass delete “deepfake” and “fake news” content

Decompiling several projects like Defeat Disinfo, shows that their network of enablers and operators includes a large number of retired and currently serving high ranking US military personal. On August 11, 2020 DefenseOne published an open letter by two retired U.S. Army lieutenant colonels, John Nagl and Paul Yingling to General Milley, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. The letter includes multiple statements like the following:

“There can be little doubt that Mr. Trump is facing electoral defeat. More than 160,000 Americans have died from COVID 19, and that toll is likely to rise to 300,000 by November. One in ten U.S. workers is unemployed, and the U.S. economy in the last quarter suffered the greatest contraction in its history. Nearly 70 percent of Americans believe the country is on the wrong track. The Economist estimates that Mr. Trump’s chances of losing the election stand at 91 percent.”

The two lieutenant colonels openly called for a coup d’état in order to remove the president by force. Not surprisingly, the two are active members of McChrystal’s Defeat Disinfo initiative. But, these military linkages go even deeper. Paul Yingling, one of the two publishers is also a close friend of Lt. Gen. H.R. McMaster and was his deputy commander in Iraq. If you are not familiar with McMaster’s little conspirator club, he managed Alexander Vindman and Eric Ciaramella, the Ukrainian whistleblower at the NSC. In 2017, Ciaramella, was McMaster’s special assistant.

A week later on August 17, 2020, in another DefenseOne publication by Thomas Crosbie titled: Six Scenarios for Military Intervention After January 2020, Crosbie provided a step-by-step playbook for the upcoming coup d’état. Again, analyzing Crosbie’s network shows the same Defeat Disinfo linkages.

The presence of senior ‘retired military’ DNA and fingerprints in the 2020 election information warfare theater (where the ADL, NIF, and J Street are active) should raise a lot of regulatory questions. Four obvious ones are:

  1. Why is the Pentagon tolerating DARPA sponsored information warfare tools being used in the US for political targeting of the administration and the president?
  2. Why does the Pentagon and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff tolerate blatant violations of Article 88 in the UCMJ?—Which clearly states that:

    Any commissioned officer who uses contemptuous words against the President, the Vice President, Congress, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of a military department, the Secretary of Transportation, or the Governor or legislature of any State, Territory, Commonwealth, or possession in which he is on duty or present shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.”

  3. Why does the DOJ, Secretary of Defense, and the Pentagon permit completely false statements like ‘…Trump’s suggesting that injecting bleach or other household disinfectants could be a treatment for the novel coronavirus’ to be published, out of all places, in US military news outlets like Stars and Stripes?
  4. Why are US non-profits like the ADL, J Street, and NIF allowed to engage in extreme partisan political activity?

The Progressive ADL Ideology
Ideologically, Greenblatt is a ‘cash on delivery’ kind of a guy. In 2016, he wrote a pro BDS essay praising Steven Levitsky and Glen Weyl and their call for a boycott of Israel. The same year Greenblatt wrote a foreign policy piece targeting Israel. In it, he argued that Israel was falsely claiming that the Palestinians were advocating for “ethnic cleansing” in Judea and Samaria (which they do, not a false claim at all). Greenblatt’s ‘expert source’ for his claims was Stefanie Fox from the Jewish Voice for Peace (JVP), a leading extremist left wing Jewish BDS organization. JVP has a $3.2 M budget and a massive 200K member outreach program. This cross pollination is not unusual, as Greenblatt’s has a long tradition of affiliation with subversive left wing groups. While serving in the Obama WH, he worked with the leadership of Avaaz and other leading anti-American and anti-Israel groups like J Street and the NIF.

Image 4
: Sampling of the JVP political activity. The organization regularly supports and participates in violent anti-US anti-Israel events and is closely affiliated with various pro-Muslim Brotherhood groups

Leading the Internet Censorship Movement
In 2018, Greenblatt established the ADL Center for Technology and Society (CTS) and received a $1.75M payment from Pierre Omidyar. Despite CTS’s wholesome and organic title, it is little more than an information warfare platform used for massive censorship, influence operations, and political targeting. The members of the CTS advisory board include disinformation specialists like Shawn Henry, the president of Crowdstrike and the brain behind the fake DNC Russian hack and Eli Pariser, the co-founder of Avaaz.

PayPal PPT
Image 5
: Screenshot of an internal PayPal executive presentation (Dan Schulman’s) showing that the ADL is used as the main source to shut down payment processing for conservative media, users, and activists.

Dan Schulman and jonathan greenblatt
Image 6
: ADL’s CEO Jonathan Greenblatt and paypal PayPal’s CEO Dan Schulman

ADL claims that they are apolitical, but it exhibits clear extreme left-wing bias through every aspect of its organizational structure and function. For example, its Belfer Fellows program is staffed entirely with pure political appointees like:

  • Naveed Jamali – An MSM talking head who made a name for himself promoting the Trump Russian collusion narrative
  • Dr. Molly Crockett – A psychologist who promoted the theory that Trump was elected because 60 million people wanted to “punish others—even at a personal cost to themselves” 
  • Dr. Amy Zhang – An assistant professor at the University of Washington who promoted Antifa propaganda and called for “the white house to disavow white supremacy”.

A Quick Tour Down the Rabbit Hole of One Front Organization
Greenblatt is a collaborator and a friend of Eli Pariser, the co-founder of Avaaz. In 2015, Avaaz’s Hebrew language webpage featured a call to support the campaign by one Daphne Leif and other ‘pro-peace’ and progressive leaders of the ‘occupy’ and ‘tent-protest’ movements.

Eli Pariser, Dafna Leif, and Raluca Ganea
Image 7
: Foreign activists and agent saboteurs (L-R) Eli Pariser, Dafna Leif, and Raluca Ganea

The idea of an American nonprofit NGO like Avaaz (which is interestingly headquartered in London and Canada) is meddling in the internal affairs of a sovereign country should raise a huge red flag. And, so should Avaaz’s ability to operate an international underground railroad for the supply of foreign left wing activist during the Obama administration. One illustration of how this maze of progressive organizations operates world-wide can be found in Raluca Ganea, one of Avaaz’s senior campaigner. Ganea, in addition to her work with Avaaz, also operated in a number of other international extreme left-wing organizations such as the NIF, Shutafut-Sharaka – where she worked as a senior media coordinator.

Shutafut-Sharaka is made up of a group of organizations (mostly EU and Soros funded) that include the NIF ‘Shatil’, the Araham Fund Initiative, Sikkui and Agenda – a “Centre for Strategic Communications” which includes among its management Rachel Liel (also director of the NIF) and Oriella Ben Zvi (of Ben Or Consulting—a firm she founded together with J Street’s president Jeremy Ben Ami (a former senior Clinton advisor). On October 17, 2018, Jeremy Ben Ami and his J Street senior leadership met with the leading holocaust denier Mahmoud Abbas and expressed support for him and PA Minister Hussein al-Sheikh–this was just days after al-Sheikh personally authorized a grisly terror attack in Jerusalem. In that attack, the terrorists murdered 3 Jews, including a Jewish woman who was pregnant with twins, and injured 100 others. Just a few months after the terror attack, in August 2019, J Street was also leading the charge in promoting and shielding Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib. It goes without saying the Greenblatt who knows Jeremy Ben Ami had little to say about this encounter.

Lineup 1
Image 8
: Agent saboteurs and paid terror enablers Jeremy Ben Ami, Rachel Liel, and Sara Benninga. In 2018, Jeremy Ben Ami was violating the Logan Act by negotiating with Mahmoud Abbas and committing to US foreign policy actions

Rachel Liel was active in her role at the NIF in international fundraising for the occupy and tent-protest movements. Raluca Ganea in the past has also used Avaaz to promote her views on other political issues such as the deportation of illegal African workers and the “aggressive Judaization of East Jerusalem“, urging Avaaz members to participate in the weekly demonstrations organized by the Sheikh Jarrah Solidarity Movement. That organization’s leader, Sara Benninga, was the recipient of an ‘Honoring Our Heroes’ award at the J Street conference in the US in February 2011. Liel, Benninga, and others also leveraged progressive platforms like the Luminate and Arabella and used the NIF and J Street funding pipelines for laundering foreign political donations.

These operations were executed by routing large payments via domestic -> foreign -> domestic bank accounts such as:

Democracy Defense Fund Ltd.
Bank Hapoalim (#12)
Branch 574
38 Hapalmach Street, Jerusalem, Israel
Israeli Account Number: 12-574-254781
IBAN: IL56-0125-7400-0000-0254-781

NIF Address in Washington:
New Israel Fund
P.O.Box 91588
Washington DC

NIF Bank details:
8516 Leesburg Pike
Vienna, VA 22182
Account # 15411834
ABA # 254070116
Account Holder: New Israel Fund

The mailers to donors (which include many of the future mega donors of the ADL) stated that:

“US residents may make a tax-exempt donation via the New Israel Fund (NIF). Checks should be made payable to “New Israel Fund”. A note with the check should be marked donor-advised to The Democracy Defense Fund, ID# 50040.”

Avaaz, NIF, J Street, the Incestuous Political Commune
Avaaz is engaged in promoting the agenda of the red green alliance and post-modern organizations, like Antifa, BLM, and B’Tselem. These organization in turn are tightly coupled and connected to the NIF and J Street and to two of Avaaz’s founders on the J Street advisory council, and Tom Perriello who had his 2008 election campaign endorsed and financed by J Street. Perriello just like Greenblatt, is also a former a senior Obama official. In his latest reincarnation, he is the executive director for U.S. programs at Soros’ Open Society Foundations.

President Obama campaigning for Tom PerrielloImage 9: President Obama campaigning for Tom Perriello for governor

Avaaz the BDS and Hamas agent
In 2009, during Operation Cast Lead, Avaaz ran a large media campaign entitled “Gaza: Stop the Bloodshed” calling for a ceasefire and re-opening of the borders and crossings and ending the blockade of Gaza. No reference was made to the thousands of Hamas rockets which terrorized Israeli civilians for years before the operation and no explanation given as to why a blockade was necessary to prevent the smuggling of arms to Gaza.  At the time, the following statement appeared on the Avaaz website:

“The people of Gaza are being squeezed to death. This week’s blackouts have finally reached the attention of the world — and the international community could help end the blockade. Our obligation is clear. This isn’t about Israel vs Palestine or Hamas vs Fatah: this is about 1.5 million human beings locked up in the biggest prison on earth…. The humanitarian crisis of sealed-off Gaza is only getting worse, and a rain of missiles is falling.”

In 2010, Avaaz firmly pinned its colors to the mast of the Turkish terror ship Mavi Marmara when it launched a petition calling for world leaders to:

“investigate the raid, end the blockade”, and describing the IHH/Muslim Brotherhood-organised flotilla as “humanitarian”.

Avaaz was also promoting a petition in support of Mahmoud Abbas’ unilateral declaration of a Palestinian state. Part of its campaign included a propaganda video analyzed by Andre Obler who concluded that:

  • Avaaz’s Israel-related campaigns were heavily biased and deceitful
  • The Avaaz web based “instant click to sign” policy encouraged its members to add their names to any US political petition without providing any background information on the issue
  • That Avaaz engaged visitors by means charged emotional language, and the promise of belonging to a “community” which “empowers” them and the plea to “tell your friends” 

These classic astroturfing campaigns were done on behalf of organizations such as Hamas, BDS, and Muslim Brotherhood affiliates like CAIR by promoting their objectives and parroting their anti-American and anti-Israel narratives. The reason why Avaaz and the ADL function as Islamic mouthpieces can be traced to Avaaz’s founding members and their roles as paid foreign agents.

Paul Hilder
Image 10
: Paul Hilder, one of the creators/promoters of the script that became “The Great Hack”, a paid propaganda piece that claimed that Trump hacked the 2016 elections using stolen data, futuristic analytics, and that the minds of millions of voters “were hacked” and manipulated to vote for him

Avaaz’a resident Middle East expert is Paul Hilder, a foreign intelligence asset and author of an 2009 article promoted by Avaaz titled “Gaza is Dying”. Hilder was employed by Oxfam in the position of campaign manager; he also worked in the same role for Avaaz and has written about online social activism for the Guardian. Like another Avaaz co-founder, Ben Brandzel, he is a board member of the British online progressive campaign organization ‘38 Degrees’, and the co-founder of ‘openDemocracy‘.

Paul Hilder and the political revolution
Image 11
: Paul Hilder’s profile and his strategy for defeating Trump

Hilder’s credentials as a ‘progressive’ social justice activist and Middle East expert make him a favorite on the international conference circuit as well as in the MSM. One less-known fact about Hilder’s resume is that at the same time as he was employed by Avaaz, he also worked as Policy Director for the Middle East Policy Initiative Forum—a collaboration between the Oxford Research Group and the ‘Conflicts Forum’—on an EU-funded report entitled “From Crisis to Opportunity. The Conflicts Forum’s stated mission was:

“From Crisis to Opportunity” aims to support a new, inclusive approach to the Arab-Israeli conflict by opening consultations among legitimate yet opposed stakeholders through civil society-brokered dialogue, analysis and engagement. The goal is to explore accommodations grounded in real support in the societies. The action will engage rooted elements of Palestinian and Israeli society and stakeholders from the wider region, including faith-based movements. “

Ben Brandzel
Image 12
: Ben Brandzel an Open Society Foundations funded expert in the formation of NGO fronts for international violent militant organizations

Just like Paul Hilder, Ben Brandzel doesn’t limit himself to only promoting jihadi terrorist organizations like Hamas and Hezbollah, he also runs multiple Antifa style organizations. Here is a small sampling: Brandzel was one of Leadnow’s original founding advisors. At the same time, he was the Director of strategic incubation at the Citizen Engagement Laboratory (CEL) based in Oakland, California, and an advisor to the The Tides Foundation (“Tides”). Timeline wise, CEL began its operations in 2008, the same year during which Tides began to fund its anti-pipeline, “Tar Sands Campaign.” The Tides Foundation was fully sponsored by Soros’ Open Society Foundations.  In 2011, Brandzel came to Canada to set up Leadnow as part of the CEL’s strategic Incubation program for grassroots revolutionary action organizations.

One of CEL’s sponsored projects was the Online Progressive Engagement Network (OPEN). Ben Brandzel was its director. OPEN describes itself as “a sisterhood of grassroots campaigning organizations from around the world.” As it appears, the CEL bundled its strategic projects—including Leadnow—into OPEN. Just like with all these other NGO’s, in 2014, Soros’ Open Society Foundations donated $100,000 to “OPEN”.

So what does this spaghetti of NGOs, projects, and international activists mean? The answer is that to the naked eye, they all seem geography separated and unrelated, but in fact, they all know each other, communicate/coordinate with each other, draw funds from the same sources, and belong to a world-wide umbrella of Soros funded progressive political initiatives.

Bring in the Iranians
Hilder’s and Brandzel Conflicts Forum was co-founded and directed by the former MI6 officer Alistair Crooke. Crooke, who doesn’t speak nor read Arabic or Farsi promotes himself as an expert on Middle East ideologies. He claims that the negative perception of Iran is entirely attributed to the western failure to accept the benefits of revolutionary Islam.

Image 13
: Alistair Crooke

Beside Crooke, the Conflicts Forum’s Board of Advisors includes Hamas supporter Azzam Tamimi, Ismail Patel of ‘Friends of Al Aqsa’, and Moazzam Begg of ‘Cageprisoners’. In describing the organization’s raison d’etre, Middle Eastern affairs analyst Dr Jonathan Spyer stated that:

“It describes its aim as opening “a new relationship between the West and the Muslim world.” A document published by this group explains their intended meaning is to bring about the basic change in Western perception and bring Hamas and Hezbollah into the mainstream. The document notes the need to build a “link-up between activist groups and mobilizers of opinion in order to shift the debate on Islamism from a predominantly defensive posture to a positive assertion of Islamist values and thinking.” It also suggests “articulation of Hamas’s and Hizballah’s values, philosophy and wider political and social programs… Being more proactive in statements and rephrasing discourse to focus on the positive aspects of Islamist ideology.”

Azzam Tamimi’s
Image 14
: Azzam Tamimi’s book glorifying Hamas

Image 15
: Ismail Haniyeh and Ismail Patel pinning each other

A deeper dive into Crooke’s ideology shows a complete embrace of hard core doctrines of the Iranian ruling clique and strongly suggests that Conflicts Forum is likely either a front for Tehran or some sort of an intelligence influence operation. Crooke frequently promotes Russian interests in the Middle East and is also close to the Qatari royal family which has been funding his activity.

According to Crooke, the true moderates in the Middle East are movements like Hamas and Hezbollah which are driving the philosophy of armed “resistance” (moqawama). Crooke claims that these movements were born in the Iranian Revolution and the more flexible intellectual traditions of Shia. He also argues that while Sunni Islam is based on a literal interpretation of the Koran, Shiite Islam is open to scholarly debate, which Crooke believes makes it more open to the Hegelian dialectic style, philosophical discourse, and positive engagement with the west. He uses Hamas as an example of Sunnis who have been positively influenced by radical Shiite ideology.

In this spirit, Conflicts Forum works to establish a:

“link-up between activist groups [Jihadi terrorist organizations] and mobilizers of opinion” and to “link with mass organizations in Western countries – social movements”. 

In a 2016 interview with Khamenei.IR (the official propaganda channel of the revolutionary guards) Crooke stated:

“Imam Khomeini was an Islamic cleric, a philosopher and a poet of high standing: pursuing what is often a private and personal voyage of inner intellectualism. He somehow, incredibly, in the words of Jaques Berques, “took in hand his people” ; gave them healing, authenticity and a solution to their crisis. He gathered up a tradition and forged a new equilibrium: one which would offer renewal through a grand ‘sewing together’ of dispersed parts, making the present ‘an organic whole’, not some mere syncretic assembly of parts. The tradition, on which he drew, was of Mulla Sadra, Ibn Arabi, Mir Damad’s.”

Alastair Crooke
Image 16
: Alistair Crooke’s interview on Khamenei.IR, the official propaganda channel of the revolutionary guards

Conflicts Forum’s relationship with Paul Hilder and Ben Brandzel appears to have provided that much needed link-up/cross-over to the American NGO Avaaz. Avaaz and J Street subsequently became engaged in the organization and mobilization of world-wide petitions in complete accord with the Hamas narrative. In this context, Avaaz and J Street are the actual link-up/cross-over and demonstrate Iran’s successful public relations campaign to re-brand Islamist terrorist in the west as proponents of “social justice”. They also work to whitewash militant organizations like BLM and Antifa and arrange US speaking engagements for convicted terrorist like Leila Khaled.

A Case Study of the ADL’s & Open Society Foundations’ Strategy and Tactics
Over the past few years, the ADL and Open Society Foundations have been funding an analytics company named Network Contagion Research Institute (NCRI). The stated objective of NCRI is to hunt down ‘white supremacists’ on the internet and trace the sources of anti-semitic and hate speech. The company claims to have developed advanced AI based analytics capable of sifting through large amount of data and identify linkages and trends. It’s difficult to verify any of their conclusions because of the proprietary nature of their datasets and algorithms. In general, most of their reports seem to be driven by a political agenda. None of their published results can be validated independently, cross verified, and be traced to specific targets—which is a crucial requirement when evaluating the validity of any source in intelligence.

In one NCRI publication titled: A Case Study on COVID-19, Bioweapon Myths, and the Asian Conspiracy Meme, their ‘scientific’ claims can be classified as paid Chinese propaganda.

Network Contagion Research Institute (NCRI)
Image 17
: Network Contagion Research Institute (NCRI) and their sponsors

What we can determine with a high degree of certainty is that:

  1. The NCRI organizational and leadership linkages show that they are working on and promoting political opposition research that is targeting Trump and his administration
  2. They are whitewashing Soros’ worldwide social justice operations
  3. They are working on wide scale political censorship projects and are targeting conservatives
  4. They are promoting information warfare operations like the Lincoln Project and pro-China Covid-19 narratives

NCRI SM Activity
Image 18
: The profile of NCRI, the ADL, UN, and Open Society Foundations sponsored ‘hate speech’ and ‘white supremacy’ hunters

Jason Baumgartner and The Lincoln Project Network
Image 19
: Jason Baumgartner, an NCRI lead data scientist and his linkages to The Lincoln Project. Baumgartner’s network consists of a number of analytic experts that promote The Lincoln Project and other materials by democratic operatives like Scott Dworkin

John Weaver and the Lincoln Project
Image 20
: John Weaver, the ultimate moral crusader and one of the founders of The Lincoln Project. Prior to signing his lucrative lobbying contract with the Russian TENEX, Weaver knew the TENAM (the US subsidiary of TENEX) leadership including members such as Vadim Mikerin. In 2016, TENAM executives were convicted of Money Laundering and Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Violations

Joel Goerge Special
Movie 1
: Paid to whitewash George Soros. The BBC Conspiracy Files: The Billionaire Global Mastermind? Joel Finkelstein, the director and co-founder of NCRI and Snopes’ rapist CEO David Mikkelson played a key role in the production of this documentary and provided the ‘scientific’ basis for the piece. The project was commissioned by Laura Silber the Chief Communications Officer for the Open Society Foundations

Greenblatt on Soros
Image 21: Greenblatt whitewashing and shielding Soros and his anti-Semitic activity through an official ADL publication titled: AntiSemitism Lurking Behind George Soros Conspiracy Theories

Final Thoughts
In the early 2000s, several US based Soros funded progressive NGOs such J Street, Avaaz, and NIF started developing a world-wide political influence and ‘justice’ network. These entities honed their subversive strategies and tactics attacking Israeli conservative movements and politicians. During the Obama administration and under the guidance of officials likes Greenblatt, these NGOs begun collaborating and helped fund extremist Islamist organizations that imported their activists/strategies/tactics (including Palestinian invented concepts such as Pyro-Terrorism and the intifada) to the US. Now, with a few exceptions, they guide and control subversive politicians like Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib and the leading ‘violent riot justice’ movements.

ActBlue and BDS
Image 22: How terrorist organizations use a leading US based democratic funding platform to raise money

Under Jonathan Greenblatt, the ADL, with the support of organizations like J Street has effectively been turned into an agent saboteur that is promoting anti-American and anti-Israel agendas and shielding/whitewashing militant hate groups like BLM, Antifa, and BDS. Starting in 2015, the ADL lost whatever little credibility it had left and is now fully engaged in wholesale defamation and censorship of conservatives and the wide-scale suppression of US free speech.

If you think that I’m over intellectualizing all these linkages (which are just the tip of the iceberg), I invite you to do a cursory examination of the organizations that now promote/support the ADL. Not surprisingly, you will find that they are made up of a coalition of the likes of The Democratic Socialists of America, the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the U.S. Campaign for Palestinian Rights, the Movement for Black Lives, Jewish Voice for Peace, Jews for Racial and Economic Justice, and many others ‘extreme’ justice organizations which have been fueling the riots across the US.

All good things must come to an end the ADL’s free 1st class ride on the moral train is no exception. The time has come to strip the ADL of its 501(c)(3) status and have the DOJ conduct a review of its dubious domestic and foreign political affiliations and funding sources. Considering the ADL’s close affiliation with organizations like Avaaz, J Street, OSF, and their leadership, they should also be investigated for supporting terrorism, money laundering, and FARA violation.

If you are considering a donation to the ADL, J Street, NIF, or any other progressive Jewish organization, don’t’! Over fifty years ago, Martin Luther King Jr. wisely observed that:

When people criticize Zionists, they mean Jews. You’re talking anti-Semitism. 

*** Update 09/30/2020 ***

the Jewish Democratic Council of America which has close ties to many of the entities identified in this post has released a 30 second video that draws parallels between the rise of fascism in Germany and the Trump presidency. This targeted message stated:

“As antisemitism and white nationalism rise to dangerous levels in America, we are all less secure. It’s time to show that we’ve learned from the darkest moments in history. Hate doesn’t stop itself. It must be stopped. Vote — our future depends on it,”

Jewish Democratic Council of America and Soros
Image 23: One hand washes the other (and both wash the face). The Jewish Democratic Council of America (JDCOA) working overtime to rehabilitate George Soros

In line with this strategy of attacking individuals like Ben Shapiro, during the presidential debate, Biden, beside dropping an “Inshallah’ (with the help of Allah), and calling for a Jihad in the US also accused President Trump of being “sort of like Goebbels.”

PBS Emgage video Biden calling for Jihad in the US Biden and Muslim vote can change history 
Video 1-3: L-R The July 21, EMGAGE Zoom conference call with Biden and the PBS watermark  published via multiple media outlets like Facebook and YouTube. The July 22, VoA produced an election campaign movie with the Urdu subtitles published on the official VoA website and via Facebook, Twitter and Instagram urging viewers to vote for Biden. The June 5, EMGAGE Vote for Biden campaign Ad

Biden’s call for Jihad in the US
Image 24
: The elements of the VoA Urdu language production (July 22) combined Biden’s call for Jihad on the Emgage Zoom call (July 21) and the Emgage ‘Million Muslim Vote’ campaign ad (June 5)

The ADL’s silent nod of approval and turning a blind eye to these types of statements and tolerance of Jihadi and Muslim anti-Semitic activity is another affirmation that the ADL and other related organizations are cashing-in on the holocaust for political and financial gain, and have completed their conversion to progressive ideological laundromats. To add insult to injury, these are the same outlets that also promote the claim that a fascist and anti-Semitic organization like Antifa is just an abstract ‘idea’.

Antifa The Imagery
Image 25: Progressive vs. fascist iconography of armed struggle

*** Update *** 02-04-2022

An article titled “The Anti-Defamation League and Amnesty International” written by Caroline Glick in Israel Hayum details how the ADL colluded with and enabled Amnesty international in developing and publishing classic Anti-Semitic materials. This includes claims such as:

“…after years of “careful study,” Amnesty’s entirely professional “researchers” determined that Israel has no right to exist. The Law of Return, which grants automatic citizenship to Jews after two thousand years of homeless wanderings, is a type of apartheid. Israel’s Jewish identity is apartheid, they said.

The purchase of private land by Jews in sovereign Israel and in Judea and Samaria is apartheid. The use of government land by Jews is apartheid. Enforcement of the laws of the state towards non-Jews – you guessed it – is apartheid in the eyes of Amnesty’s hard-nosed, totally unbiased “investigators.”Amnesty concluded as well that since Israel is an apartheid state that has no right to exist, Israel is guilty of crimes against humanity and, (it almost goes without saying), of war crimes. Unlike the wretched, cruel, greedy and avaricious Jews, the Palestinians are as pure as the driven snow. The word “terror” only appears three times in Amnesty’s 210-page tome and terror is never mentioned as a means to explain any defensive action that Israel has undertaken.

As was to be expected, Amnesty used its new “Jews are Criminals” report to renew its call for Israel and its citizens to be tried for war crimes before the International Criminal Court in The Hague. The “human rights” group also rode its blood libel wave to renew its call for economic sanctions and an arms embargo against Israel. Amnesty capped its bloodlust off with a call for Israel’s destruction through the immigration of millions of hostile foreign-born Arabs allegedly descended from Arabs who left Israel during the 1948 pan-Arab invasion of the nascent Jewish state…”

XRVision Sentinel AI Platform – Face recognition, image reconstruction, and object classification

Terrorists in Suits: The ties between progressive NGOs and terrorist organizations

In Mahmoud  Abbas’ 1982 thesis, titled “al-Wajh al-Akhar: al-‘Alaqat as-Sirriya bayna an-Naziya wa’s-Sihyuniya” (The Other Side: The Secret Relationship Between Nazism and Zionism) at the Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Abbas claims that the number of Jews killed during World War II was less than one million and that their death was a joint Zionist-Nazi plot. It’s interesting to note that Abbas worked with the director of the Peoples’ Friendship University, Yevgeny Primakov. Primakov was one of the architects of the Soviet active measures doctrine and the masterminds behind one of the most successful KGB disinformation initiatives called Operation INFEKTION.

Naveed Jamili Greenblatt’s Lead Intelligence Analyst
Something fairly big is coming: Jamili predicts Russia bombshell after Trump evasions
Crazy’ Idea the FBI Was Plotting a ‘Coup’ Against Trump
MSNBC’s Naveed Jamali: Trump is “extraordinarily worried…he should be.”

The Literary Jewels of Wannabe Coup Plotters John Nagl & Paul Yingling
General McMaster’s must not just stand by while a lie is being promulgated
Article ” Taking Sides In Ferguson ” Commentary Magazine
Dear Mr. Secretary, You Can Rename Army Bases Right Now
Opinion | Retired generals warned us about Rumsfeld. Now they’re warning us about Trump

The Source and Meaning of Biden’s Jihadi Speech
Biden cites Abu Sa`eed al-Khudree (Abu Sa’eed Al-Khudri), who was one of the ‘companions of the prophet’. al-Khudree is considered a leading transmitter of hadith (traditions attributed to Mohammad). He has over 1150 traditions to his name, making him the seventh largest source of ‘authentic’ hadiths. Biden’s passage came from Hadith Nawawi 34:

“I heard the Messenger of Allah (Mohammad) say, Whosoever of you sees an evil, let him change it with his hand; and if he is not able to do so, then [let him change it] with his tongue; and if he is not able to do so, then with his heart — and that is the weakest of faith.” 

The definition of “change” and “with his hand” can be further illuminated by Sahih Muslim’s Book of faith Hadith 179. Another canonical work on hadiths. In 50 a: Book 1, Hadith 86 we find the following passage:

“It is narrated on the authority ‘Abdullah b. Mas’ud that the Messenger of Allah observed:

Never a Prophet had been sent before me by Allah towards his nation who had not among his people (his) disciples and companions who followed his ways and obeyed his command. Then there came after them their successors who said whatever they did not practise, and practised whatever they were not commanded to do. He who strove against them with his hand was a believer: he who strove against them with his tongue was a believer, and he who strove against them with his heart was a believer and beyond that there is no faith even to the extent of a mustard seed.”

This reference repeats in several other credible sources such as Riyad as-Salihin, the book of Miscellany and Mishkat al-Masabih book of Faith.

The Arabic word for ‘strove’ is جاهد (Jahidun) and means to ‘wage Jihad’. This term is used in various related forms such as Mujahideen a plural form of mujahid, the Arabic term for one engaged in jihad.

By citing Abu Sa`eed al-Khudree and others and talking about ‘removing evil’ in the context of president Trump and his administration, there is no doubt that Biden (or his handler) is referencing the classic Islamic jurist definition of Jihad, which includes these three functions:

  1. Jihad by the hand – Jihad bil yad (force) – struggle through physical means (such joining a Jihadi army).
  2. Jihad by the tongue – Jihad bil lisan (speech) – struggle through writing and speeches (such as the Dawa – call to Islam).
  3. Jihad of the heart – Jihad bin nafs (faith) – fighting sin.

What is EMGAGE – Sourced from Clare Lopez
Emgage Action is a Muslim Brotherhood-linked Political Action Committee (PAC) that endorsed Biden back in April 2020. Left out of most media accounts, however, is the fact that Emgage Action’s parent organization, Emgage USA (formerly called Emerge USA, an acronym for Empowering, Motivating, & Educating Resourceful Grassroots Entities), is a front group for the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR), which is the U.S. branch of designated Foreign Terrorist Organization, HAMAS (itself the Palestinian branch of the Muslim Brotherhood). CAIR was named by the Department of Justice an unindicted co-conspirator in the 2008 Holy Land Foundation HAMAS terror funding trial.

Additional links
Joe Biden Calls for Jihad Against America – Clare Lopez
Islamic Movement Influence Operations Target Biden Campaign – Matthew Edwards

Copyright 2020 Yaacov Apelbaum, All Rights Reserved.

28 thoughts on “The Anti-Defamation League Must Go

  1. Great article! Great research. Do you have any demos of the actual XRVision process? Really curious in general about your workflow.

    …but the facts are that Leo Frank, a Jew, raped a 13 year old gentile girl… and that the community reacted accordingly when they lynched him…

    • Thank for your comment jungianimal,

      Anti-semitism has always been a social binder, and a such plays a major role in community adhesion. Anti-semitism is the glue connected the medieval serf and the feudal lord (who otherwise had little in common). Today, its one of the main binders of the red-green alliance. As long people continue to perpetuate Paul’s Blood libel that the ‘Jews are enemies of the whole human race’ (1 Thessalonians 2:15), humanity will continue to carry this egregious stain .

      I think that the Leo Frank lynching was a major factor in the formation of the ADL but, there were many other triggers as well. Regarding your claim that Frank “raped a 13 year old female gentile”. The Frank case was a clear example of miscarriage of justice driven by irrational and rampant Jew hatred. After the trial and Frank’s death sentence commutation, Governor Slaton told reporters that he was certain that Jim Conley and not Leo Frank was the actual murderer. Slaton also stated that he would have issued a full pardon, if not for his belief that Frank would soon be able to prove his innocence. Despite all of this, Frank wasn’t allowed to defend himself and was murdered by the local blood thirsty KKK mob, AKA the “Knights of Mary Phagan”.

      My issue with with the ADL is not that they are failing to fight Anti-semitism, but that they have turned into a despotic extreme left wing secret police that is now ‘strategically’ perpetuating Anti-semitism and taking an active role in the persecution of Jews, Christians, and conservatives.

    • Most people who have studied the Leo Frank case believe that he, like Dreyfus in France somewhat earlier, was wrongly convicted.

      His trial represented the first time in the history of the state of Georgia that a white man (Frank) was convicted of murder on the word of a black man. Gov. Slaton came to believe that the black witness was in fact the guilty party, and was lying to save himself.

      The total context of the case, and its aftermath, in fact, have many parallels to the present day coup attempt against President Trump.

      Just as Gov. Slaton had been a lifelong friend of Frank’s prosecutor, but eventually broke with him during the review of Frank’s clemency request, so President Trump had once worked (as a witness) with the team of investigators and prosecutors who pursued the infamous BCCI (Bank of Credit and Commerce International) case. This team included many of the same players (e.g. Mueller, Rosenstein, Comey,) who, as DoJ and FBI leaders, would eventually persecute Trump in the Spygate affair.

      And just as an anti-Semitic Democrat mob threatened the Governor’s Mansion in Georgia, in a violent challenge to the rule of law, only to be dispersed by a horse-mounted Georgia state force, so anti-Semitic Democrat mobs have repeatedly threatened the White House, in violent challenges to the rule of law this summer, only to be repelled by the Secret Service.

      In both cases, a major blow would have been dealt to constitutional government in this nation, had the Democrat rioters succeeded in their respective attacks.

      • Thank you for you comment Covadonga,

        I agree, the accusations and attacks against President Trump are almost identical to the the Dreyfus affair (all the way down to the sources and methods). You can find the comparison of the Dreyfus vs. Steele Dossier plotline here. You can also find a deeper dive into who wrote the Steele Dossier here.

  2. Yaakov Apelbaum – you never cease to amaze me with your one of a kind research and beautiful mind.

    Shalom Aleichem sir!

  3. another tour de force effort, yaacov, I did feel that this resembled the campaigns against netanyahu and the israeli right in general,

  4. I am flabbergasted !
    I wish I had the photographic memory to inhale all of what I just read ! And send my life in the persuit of stopping them ! LETTING EVERY AMERICAN KNOW , and every person who gives to this ; NOW ENEMY ; Counterfeit Jewish Group !

    Alas !
    I am old and an insolvent widow ! My husband and father of our five children was murdered by three illegal aliens !

    I will pray daily and fast for the Continued Holy Existence of My Beloved HOLY LAND , ISRAEL 🇮🇱 AND MY COUNTRY OF AMERICA ! 🇺🇸!
    So closely linked .
    I will pray and fast for Our Sovereign Nation ‘s !

    Loving Kindness, lindalee

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *